Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
December 1, 2010 by Personal Privacies
Filed under Information privacy law
Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
Free Online Articles Directory
Why Submit Articles?
Top Authors
Top Articles
FAQ
AB Answers
0 && $.browser.msie ) {
var ie_version = parseInt($.browser.version);
if(ie_version Hello Guest
Login
Register
Hello
My Home
Sign Out
Email
Password
Remember me?
Lost Password?
Home Page > Law > Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
Posted: Oct 05, 2009 |Comments: 0
| Views: 109
|
]]>
Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
By: Shireen Smith
About the Author
Shireen Smith is an intellectual property solicitor and technology lawyer at Azrights Solicitors providing advice on trademark registration, patents and domains and domain disputes.
View the original article along with others on trademarks, domains and other legal matters at http://www.ip-brands.com/content/news/articles.aspx
(ArticlesBase SC #1303364)
Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/ – Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
Although it is difficult to get a successful result in an online defamation issue, it can be done by carefully establishing who is making the comment, and where they are based. Other important considerations are how damaging the comments are and whether threats might drive the defamer to make further comments. Litigation and threats of litigation are not always the best way forwards but they can be a useful tool. The Facebook case illustrates one such instance where litigation was used to stop defamation on a social networking site.
The Facebook case: A modern take on defamation
Many web users have a false belief that they can say anything they want on the internet and not be held responsible. The courts are finding otherwise. In the most recent English case, Applause Store Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB) (QBD), a man was held liable for comments made on Facebook. Although the limits of defamation law were hardly stretched in this case, it is interesting to see how the court responded.
The case involved Mathew Firsht, the owner of Applause productions, a well known company which provides audiences for television shows. He did not have a Facebook account. In June 2007 a fake profile was placed up on Facebook in an account using Mr. Firsht’s name. This featured extensive personal information about him including his sexual orientation, political views, religious beliefs and a picture – supposedly of Mr. Firsht – but which was actually a copy of the profile picture from his twin brother’s Facebook page. The profile also included a link to a Facebook Group called ‘Has Mathew Firsht lied to you?’ In this case there was no dispute about whether the material was defamatory but only over whom had put up the profile and the group.
The defendant, a Mr. Raphael who had been a friend of Mr. Firsht and also knew him professionally, had his identity revealed after Firsht’s lawyers sent a takedown notice to Facebook and obtained a Norwich Pharmacal order against Facebook. The order required Facebook to disclose not only the registration data but also details of the IP addresses and email addresses which created the profile.
The profile had in fact been created by someone at Mr. Raphael’s IP address. After the profile was created all relevant activity which occurred on the fake account continued to come from Mr. Raphael’s IP address. The same IP address was also used during this time to login into two other Facebook accounts: Mr. Raphael’s account and Mr. Raphael’s girlfriend’s account. The fake account had only been signed into from two different computers at the IP address which included Mr. Raphael’s computer and his girlfriend’s laptop which he admitted he often used. The facts about the IP address and login details were not refuted by Mr. Raphael.
The case gets even stranger. Mr. Raphael’s defence was that he did not create the profile and that the evening the profile was created he and his girlfriend had met a group of strangers at a bar who then returned home with them and spent the night. He said that one of them must have created the profile from his computer. He did not give an explanation of how someone else had been logging into the account from his IP address on the subsequent times the account had been accessed which would have been after the fake profile creating stranger left his home. He instead choose to defend himself by relying on alibi evidence that he had not been at home on the other occasions when the Facebook profile had been accessed so it had to have been someone else.
The judge did not believe his story at all (rightly so) and decided that Mr. Raphael had in fact been the one to put up the false profile as well as the defamatory group. Although the profile was not visible for a considerable length of time, 16-17 days, the judge ruled that due to the popularity and nature of Facebook, which targeted the material towards people who knew Mr. Firsht, the materials were particularly damaging. The Judge also ruled that the allegations of dishonesty were serious enough to harm Mr. Firsht’s business so allocated the award with £15,000 to Mr. Firsht personally, £5,000 to his business and an extra £2,000 for breach of his privacy. In this case, Mr. Raphael learned to his chagrin that comments made online can be costly and that lawyers can often get around the anonymity problem with IP addresses identifying computers not users.
Liability of Internet Service Providers
The other point to bear in mind when discussing defamation on the internet is that in some jurisdictions, including England, Internet Service Providers can have liability for content on the sites they host. They can be liable even if they were merely passively hosting the site unless they take down the objectionable material when they receive notice of it. The famous case on this point in England is Godfrey v. Demon. In that case, an unknown person purporting to be Godfrey put up a comment on Demon’s server. The statement was defamatory. The real Mr. Godfrey asked to have it removed telling Demon that it was fraudulent. When Demon failed to remove the post Godfrey sued for defamation and won. This case established the importance of ISPs treating complaints seriously and investigating and taking down any content that can be considered defamatory.
Since this case, the E-commerce directive has come into effect which also has ramifications for when a host can be liable in defamation (or for other acts). ISPs are in a difficult position. On the one hand if they remove any content posted by their customers they could be in breach of their customers’ contractual rights (unless their contracts expressly absolve them from liability in certain circumstances) On the other hand if they don’t remove the content they could become personally liable for it to third parties.
Under the E-commerce Directive most ISPs will be viewed by the courts as a mere conduit and therefore not liable for the content, as long as they do not initiate the transmission, select the receiver of the transmission and do not select or modify the information in the transmission. Nevertheless, ISPs will still have liability if they are notified of infringing material and then refuse to take it down, and there are those who believe their responsibilities should be broadened further.
The position in the USA
In the United States, ISPs are not liable for defamatory information but they are often joined as co-defendants in lawsuits with John Doe.? There is a purely practical reason for doing this. ISPs are becoming increasingly wary of divulging information about their users since it could be an invasion of privacy.
By joining the ISPs as defendants, once the lawsuit is initiated lawyers can make discovery demands of the ISP to get all of the relevant data which could help them trace the unidentified user who posted the comment. Once the user is identified the ISP is usually dropped from the lawsuit and the user remains the sole defendant.
These laws not only have ramifications for ISPs but for any company which has a forum or allows user generated content on their website. Many companies are not aware that they themselves can be found liable for defamation due to actions of employees or other third parties on these websites. In-house lawyers are becoming increasingly aware of the laws on defamation and privacy in order to take adequate steps to protect their employers.
What to do
If you find that you are the subject of a defamatory comment online there are a number of things that can be done. Clearly balance the seriousness of the comment with the costs associated with getting it taken down. The last resort option would involve going to court to get disclosure orders. Unless the comments are particularly grievous or widespread other avenues should be explored first.
If you are dealing with a hate site that uses a domain name similar to your company name there may be the possibility of trying to retrieve the domain name through a UDRP or other dispute resolution policy. However, this can be risky since at the moment it has not been decided whether these types of sites constitute fair use under the rules. The other problem with this method is that you may inflame the situation further. Also your efforts could be wasted if the site simply reappears on another non-infringing domain name.
Another option is to address the comment in the press or on your own website. Recently, in Israel, an anonymous internet user began a hate campaign against Israel’s best known maker of dairy products. Defamatory comments were posted on a variety of websites and also sent around through emails. The company responded to the situation by posting comments on the website and also sending out their own emails via employees which defended their business. This approach has been successful as content is no longer being posted and the record has been set straight for anyone doing future web searches.
It should always be kept in mind that attacks are often short lived. Surprisingly the best option sometimes can be to deal with the situation by ignoring it, and possibly using SEO strategies to keep the site or the comment low down in the search results. The comment or website will often disappear since it takes a lot of energy to keep the site sufficiently prominent.
Retrieved from “http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/defamation-law-part-2-successful-strategies-to-deal-with-online-defamation-february-2009-1303364.html”
(ArticlesBase SC #1303364)
Shireen Smith -
About the Author:
Shireen Smith is an intellectual property solicitor and technology lawyer at Azrights Solicitors providing advice on trademark registration, patents and domains and domain disputes.
View the original article along with others on trademarks, domains and other legal matters at http://www.ip-brands.com/content/news/articles.aspx
]]>
Rate this Article
vote(s)
0 vote(s)
Feedback
RSS
Print
Email
Re-Publish
Article Tags:
defamation, law, online, website, internet law, privacy law, internet
Latest Law Articles
More from Shireen Smith
Defamation Law – Part I – February 2009
The internet has radically changed the nature of defamation law. While it was once a specialised subject left to media lawyers it is now a topic on which most internet lawyers have to advise.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Lawl
Oct 05, 2009
Social Network Marketing Ethics
Are you involved in social networking? Do you know what can hurt you in your long term online business efforts? Find out now!
By:
Dan Statherl
Marketing>
Social Marketingl
Aug 05, 2010
lViews: 177
Many times on the news you hear a report about a shooting, killing or violent incident and the person at the heart of the incident is passed off as mentally ill, and the society reacts by creating additional laws to protect themselves from the mentally ill. What many in society still do not understand or realize is that there is a dark side to many of those shootings and violent incidents, there is a dark side that society would rather not have you know about.
By:
gangstalkingl
News and Societyl
Apr 24, 2010
lComments: 1
Can-spam: “no Harm, No Foul” — 4th Circuit Passes on Trivial Violations
The federal CAN-SPAM Act permits the sending of unsolicited email advertisements under certain conditions. One condition is that header information in the email should not be “materially false or materially misleading”. What does this mean, and if you make a “technical” mistake in an email header, are you strictly liable under CAN-SPAM?
By:
Chip Cooperl
Internetl
Jun 22, 2008
lViews: 236
While social networking sites like Myspace and Facebook may appear to be treasure troves for employers at first glance, they can actually prove to be hazardous to businesses when used for hiring decisions. Find out how!
By:
Lester Rosenl
Business>
Human Resourcesl
Jun 08, 2009
lViews: 345
The Basics of Inheritance Tax Law
Inheritance Tax law known as the death tax is a form of tax being imposed on the estate of the deceased on its distribution to the legitimate persons and family members. It has to be filed in compliance with laws of the state.
By:
John Dethridgel
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
300,000 Jury Verdict For Bicyclist Considerable Hurt In SUV Accident
This article analyzes a documented lawsuit in which a driver distorted the facts about the way an accident in which a woman was severely harmed took place in an attempt to put the blame on the plaintiff. By carrying out a detailed investigation, the law firm that helped the bicyclist obtained a substantial jury award for the bicyclist.
By:
J. Hernandezl
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
Getting Real Debt Relief from Expert Seattle Bankruptcy Attorneys
Bankruptcy can destroy lives. It may start out as a small financial deficit but when left unsolved, it can easily spiral out of control, damaging everything in its path – from your career, you property, even your family. So it is very important that you address these problems as soon as they come.
By:
David Fullerl
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
Law Firm Organization: How Well Do You Know It?
One key to a successful practice is the strength of the firm behind you. Sure, you have to be smart, dedicated, and driven, but your law firm has to be organized as well. Without a full understanding of how your law firm works, you can’t be 100% effective. Why? Because you are part of a whole, and every piece must fit in order for the system to operate smoothly.
By:
Kendra Brodinl
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
Importance of Security Lawyers
Mineola Securities Litigation and Arbitration Lawyer – John E. Lawlor Long Island NY Securities Litigation and Arbitration Lawyer
Seventy One Year Old Female Pedestrian Endures Several Fractures In Accident And Recovers $300,000
If you were hurt as a pedestrian in a motor vehicle accident and file a claim for personal injury you might discover that the driver involved actually claims you were responsible for the accident. Lawyers experienced and skilled at handling pedestrian accident matters recognize that the best response to this is to understand the rights of pedestrians, extensively investigate the accident, and position the matter for trial.
By:
J. Hernandezl
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
Adjudication and Security of Payment
When late or non-payment occurs in the building and construction industry it is not always necessary to take the matter to court, a costly and time-consuming exercise.
By:
Finance Consultantl
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
Consider Getting Your Kids a Tutor
Many kids currently struggle in school. There is certainly plenty of discussion regarding the reason for this, some attributing it to school system while others to tv. Regardless, many moms and dads are aggravated by this. Together, most of the same families do not feel comfortable teaching a subject that’s so far gone to them, or they might simply work too many hours to raise their little ones and teach them too. This is where a tutor comes in handy. Home tutors work one-on-one (…
By:
Nick Pentl
Lawl
Dec 01, 2010
Starting a Business: Trade marks, company names, and domains
Your business name can develop to become one of your most valuable assets, through marketing and the development of a relationship between the public and your brand. It is important therefore to register a trade mark, and to do so before you begin to use a name for your business.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Law>
Trademarksl
Apr 26, 2010
Protecting your Brand with a Registered Trade Mark
Your branding differentiates your products and services from those of your competitors, it lets your customers develop loyalty based on expectations of quality and service, and it can attract prospective clients and consumers. These are just some of the ways in which value accumulates in your brand, and just some of the features that competing businesses might try to exploit.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Law>
Trademarksl
Apr 26, 2010
In a Class of their own: Tying your brand name to your offerings
Trade mark registration can grant exclusive rights to use a brand name or logo. It is therefore crucial that your trade mark is registered in appriproate classes.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Law>
Intellectual Propertyl
Apr 26, 2010
Across the Pond: The territorial nature of trade marks, and taking your brand abroad
One of the most important things to consider if you intend to carry out business internationally is whether you are able to export your brand. Developing brand equity can be arduous and expensive, an investment that might be wasted in cases where you cannot operate under your brand abroad.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Law>
Trademarksl
Apr 26, 2010
Engaging a Web Designer – one contract you should read – February 2009
It is amazing how naïve otherwise sensible business people can be when it comes to commissioning a designer to develop a website for them. Whether it is a lack of knowledge or simple forgetfulness this lax approach can have serious consequences.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Lawl
Oct 05, 2009
Having a Virtual Presence Online
In the last few years many big companies have been making news by establishing a virtual presence in an online world. The most common place for businesses to do this is in Metaverses which are also called virtual worlds.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Internet>
Internet Marketingl
Oct 05, 2009
Defamation Law – Part I – February 2009
The internet has radically changed the nature of defamation law. While it was once a specialised subject left to media lawyers it is now a topic on which most internet lawyers have to advise.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Lawl
Oct 05, 2009
Defamation Law Part 2: Successful strategies to deal with online defamation – February 2009
Although it is difficult to get a successful result in an online defamation issue, it can be done by carefully establishing who is making the comment, and where they are based.
By:
Shireen Smithl
Lawl
Oct 05, 2009
lViews: 109
Add new Comment
Your Name: *
Your Email:
Comment Body: *
Verification code:*
* Required fields
Submit
Your Articles Here
It’s Free and easy
Sign Up Today
Author Navigation
My Home
Publish Article
View/Edit Articles
View/Edit Q&A
Edit your Account
Manage Authors
Statistics Page
Personal RSS Builder
My Home
Edit your Account
Update Profile
View/Edit Q&A
Publish Article
Author Box
Shireen Smith has 20 articles online
Articles Categories
All Categories
Advertising
Arts & Entertainment
Automotive
Beauty
Business
Careers
Computers
Education
Finance
Food and Beverage
Health
Hobbies
Home and Family
Home Improvement
Internet
Law
Marketing
News and Society
Relationships
Self Improvement
Shopping
Spirituality
Sports and Fitness
Technology
Travel
Writing
Bankruptcy
Copyright
Criminal
Cyber Law
Health and Safety
Immigration
Intellectual Property
Internet Law
National, State, Local
Patents
Personal Injury
Regulatory Compliance
Trademarks
]]>
Need Help?
Contact Us
FAQ
Submit Articles
Editorial Guidelines
Blog
Site Links
Recent Articles
Top Authors
Top Articles
Find Articles
Site Map
Webmasters
RSS Builder
RSS
Link to Us
Business Info
Advertising
Use of this web site constitutes acceptance of the Terms Of Use and Privacy Policy | User published content is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Copyright © 2005-2010 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved.
Shireen Smith is an intellectual property solicitor and technology lawyer at Azrights Solicitors providing advice on trademark registration, patents and domains and domain disputes.
View the original article along with others on trademarks, domains and other legal matters at http://www.ip-brands.com/content/news/articles.aspx
